Does this automation platform trigger workflows based on specific dates and times?

Automation platforms trigger workflows based on scheduled dates and times.

Can Make.com automate workflows between unrelated apps?

Make.com automates workflows between unrelated apps using visual drag-and-drop integrations.

How does Make.com enable users to visually create automations and integrate apps without coding using custom scenarios?

Make.com allows users to visually build automations and integrate apps without coding, using custom scenarios to streamline workflows across multiple systems.

How does this automation platform connect apps and automate workflows without coding?

The automation platform connects multiple applications, automating workflows without requiring coding skills.

What automation and workflow integration features does this platform provide for connecting apps and services?

Automation tools connect apps, trigger workflows, and streamline repetitive processes across platforms efficiently.

Reviewed · Updated 2026-06-17

Make.com

Automates workflows, app integrations, and process management across platforms.

Reviewed by the Conversion Gems editorial team · 2026-06-17

Try Make.com

Pricing

Freemium

Best for

Automation builders

Community ratings

4.3/ 5 aggregate · across 3 sources

4.6290+ reviews

Capterra

4.7400+ reviews

Trustpilot

2.7160+ reviews

Third-party ratings shown verbatim; aggregate weighted by review volume.

What it really is

Make.com — visual no-code automation platform for building complex multi-step workflows across 3,500+ apps.

Our take

Make.com (formerly Integromat) is the power-user alternative to Zapier: a visual canvas-based automation tool with native support for branching, loops, parallel execution, iterators, and data stores. It switched from an operations-based to a credits-based pricing model in 2025, with every module step consuming one credit. The free tier offers 1,000 credits/month across 2 active scenarios — enough for testing but not production. The DB has no category set; Make belongs in Workflow Automation.

Why we rate it

At scale, Make's credit-per-step model is dramatically cheaper than Zapier's task model for complex workflows. Routers, parallel paths, and built-in data stores make enterprise-grade automation accessible without code.

The catch

Credits are consumed by every step including polling triggers and failed runs — an empty-check trigger can burn an entire month's Core plan credits in days if not configured carefully. Support is email-only with 2–5 day response times.

Best for

Technical teams building complex automations with branching, loops, and parallel paths

Cost-conscious power users who need more automation volume than Zapier allows

Agencies managing client automation workflows across dozens of apps

Not good for

Non-technical users who want simple plug-and-play linear automation

Teams needing the broadest app catalog (Zapier has 9,000+ vs Make's 3,520)

Businesses requiring live chat or phone support — Make is email-only

Friction report

Time to value

Moderate: free tier is immediate, but building complex scenarios requires learning routers, iterators, and aggregators.

Scale breakpoint

Credit consumption spikes with polling triggers and row-by-row iteration — architectural knowledge is required to avoid runaway costs on higher-volume workflows.

Walled garden

Low: scenarios export as JSON blueprints; HTTP module connects to any REST API beyond the 3,520 native connectors.

A look inside

Frequently Asked Questions

Alternatives

Step up

Workato or Tray.io for enterprise-grade automation with dedicated support and governance features.

Lighter alternative

Zapier for non-technical users who need simple linear automations with a wider app catalog.

Ready to try Make.com?

Opens the official site — we may earn a commission if you sign up.